Web服务 – REST(RESTful)Web服务是否与HTTP绑定(耦合或需要)？

概述标题基本上都说明了,REST真的与HTTP绑定还是协议无关？ 因为我刚读了几篇关于REST的文章,所以我遇到了两个意见,所以我不知道哪一个是正确的. 请允许我引用 “RESTful Web Services”这本书(粗体是我的)： The Story of the REST REST is simple, but it’s well defined and not an excuse for im 标题基本上都说明了,REST真的与http绑定还是协议无关？
因为我刚读了几篇关于REST的文章,所以我遇到了两个意见,所以我不知道哪一个是正确的.解决方法 请允许我引用 “RESTful Web Services”这本书(粗体是我的)：

The Story of the REST

REST is simple,but it’s well defined and not an
excuse for implementing web services as half-assed web sites because
“they’re the same.” Unfortunately,until Now the main REST reference
was chapter five of Roy FIElding’s 2000 Ph.D. dissertation,which is a
good read for a Ph.D. dissertation,but leaves most of the real-world
questions unanswered. That’s because it presents REST not as an
architecture but as a way of judging architectures. The term “RESTful”
is like the term “object-orIEnted.” A language,a framework,or an
application may be designed in an object-orIEnted way,but that
doesn’t make its architecture the object-orIEnted architecture. Even
in object-orIEnted languages like C++ and Ruby,it’s possible to write
programs that are not truly object-orIEnted. http in the abstract does
very well on the criteria of REST. (It ought to,since FIElding
co-wrote the http standard and wrote his dissertation to describe the
architecture of the Web.) But real web sites,web applications,and
web services often betray the principles of REST. (…)

请注意,在第二个粗体中,他说：“http非常适合REST”,而不是“REST适合/依赖于http”.

因此,简而言之：不,术语“REST”不一定与http相关联. RESTful Web服务只是遵循RESTful架构的Web服务,希望实现FIElding在其论文中列出的好处(例如无状态,可寻址性等).

创建RESTful Web服务的一种方法是根据资源(而不是SOAP样式使用的 *** 作)来考虑应用程序.结合正确使用http(其方法和状态代码)的这种思维方式可以导致支持REST的架构(并且具有所有好处)FIElding的论文枚举.

@H_419_51@ 总结

以上是内存溢出为你收集整理的Web服务 – REST(RESTful)Web服务是否与HTTP绑定(耦合或需要)？全部内容，希望文章能够帮你解决Web服务 – REST(RESTful)Web服务是否与HTTP绑定(耦合或需要)？所遇到的程序开发问题。

如果觉得内存溢出网站内容还不错，欢迎将内存溢出网站推荐给程序员好友。