C#多线程编程中的锁系统(四):自旋锁

C#多线程编程中的锁系统(四):自旋锁,第1张

概述目录一:基础二:自旋锁示例三:SpinLock四:继续SpinLock五:总结一:基础内核锁:基于内核对象构造的锁机制,就是通常说的内核构造模式。用户模式构造和内核模式构造

目录
一:基础

二:自旋锁示例

三:SpinLock

四:继续SpinLock

五:总结

一:基础

内核锁:基于内核对象构造的锁机制,就是通常说的内核构造模式。用户模式构造和内核模式构造

           优点:cpu利用最大化。它发现资源被锁住,请求就排队等候。线程切换到别处干活,直到接受到可用信号,线程再切回来继续处理请求。

           缺点:托管代码->用户模式代码->内核代码损耗、线程上下文切换损耗。

                   在锁的时间比较短时,系统频繁忙于休眠、切换,是个很大的性能损耗。

自旋锁:原子 *** 作+自循环。通常说的用户构造模式。  线程不休眠,一直循环尝试对资源访问,直到可用。

           优点:完美解决内核锁的缺点。

           缺点:长时间一直循环会导致cpu的白白浪费,高并发竞争下、cpu的消耗特别严重。

混合锁:内核锁+自旋锁。 混合锁是先自旋锁一段时间或自旋多少次,再转成内核锁。

           优点:内核锁和自旋锁的折中方案,利用前二者优点,避免出现极端情况(自旋时间过长,内核锁时间过短)。

           缺点: 自旋多少时间、自旋多少次,这些策略很难把控。

           ps: *** 作系统或net框架,这块算法策略做的已经非常优了,有些API函数也提供了时间及次数可配置项,让开发者根据需求自行判断。

 

二:自旋锁示例

来看下我们自己简单实现的自旋锁:
复制代码 代码如下:
int signal = 0;
            var li = new List<int>();
            Parallel.For(0,1000 * 10000,r =>
            {
                while (Interlocked.Exchange(ref signal,1) != 0)//加自旋锁
                {
                    //黑魔法
                }
                li.Add(r);
                Interlocked.Exchange(ref signal,0);  //释放锁
            });
            Console.Writeline(li.Count);
            //输出:10000000

上面就是自旋锁:Interlocked.Exchange+while

1:定义signal  0可用,1不可用。

2:Parallel模拟并发竞争,原子更改signal状态。 后续线程自旋访问signal,是否可用。

3:A线程使用完后,更改signal为0。 剩余线程竞争访问资源,B线程胜利后,更改signal为1,失败线程继续自旋,直到可用。

三:SpinLock

SpinLock是net4.0后系统帮我们实现的自旋锁,内部做了优化。

简单看下实例:
 复制代码 代码如下:
 var li = new List<int>();
            var sl = new SpinLock();
            Parallel.For(0,r =>
            {
                bool gotLock = false;     //释放成功
                sl.Enter(ref gotLock);    //进入锁
                li.Add(r);
                if (gotLock) sl.Exit();  //释放
            });
            Console.Writeline(li.Count);
            //输出:10000000
 

四:继续SpinLock

new SpinLock(false)   这个构造函数主要用来帮我们检查死锁用,true是开启。

开启状态下,如果发生死锁会直接抛异常的。

贴了一部分源码(已折叠),我们来看下:
复制代码 代码如下:
public voID Enter(ref bool lockTaken)
        {
            if (lockTaken)
            {
                lockTaken = false;
                throw new System.ArgumentException(Environment.GetResourceString("SpinLock_TryReliableEnter_ArgumentException"));
            }

            // Fast path to acquire the lock if the lock is released
            // If the thread tracking enabled set the new owner to the current thread ID
            // ID not,set the anonymous bit lock
            int observedOwner = m_owner;
            int newOwner = 0;
            bool threadTrackingEnabled = (m_owner & LOCK_ID_disABLE_MASK) == 0;
            if (threadTrackingEnabled)
            {
                if (observedOwner == LOCK_UNowNED)
                    newOwner = Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadID;
            }
            else if ((observedOwner & LOCK_ANONYMOUS_OWNED) == LOCK_UNowNED)
            {
                newOwner = observedOwner | LOCK_ANONYMOUS_OWNED; // set the lock bit
            }
            if (newOwner != 0)
            {
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                Thread.BeginCriticalRegion();
#endif

#if PFX_LEGACY_3_5
                if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,newOwner,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                {
                    lockTaken = true;
                    return;
                }
#else
                if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner,ref lockTaken) == observedOwner)
                {
                    // Fast path succeeded
                    return;
                }
#endif
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                Thread.EndCriticalRegion();
#endif
            }
            //Fast path Failed,try slow path
            ContinueTryEnter(Timeout.Infinite,ref lockTaken);
        }
private voID ContinueTryEnter(int millisecondsTimeout,ref bool lockTaken)
        {
            long startTicks = 0;
            if (millisecondsTimeout != Timeout.Infinite && millisecondsTimeout != 0)
            {
                startTicks = DateTime.UtcNow.Ticks;
            }

#if !FEATURE_PAL && !FEATURE_CORECLR   // PAL doesn't support  eventing,and we don't compile CDS provIDers for Coreclr
            if (CdsSyncEtwBCLProvIDer.Log.IsEnabled())
            {
                CdsSyncEtwBCLProvIDer.Log.SpinLock_FastPathFailed(m_owner);
            }
#endif

            if (IsThreadOwnerTrackingEnabled)
            {
                // Slow path for enabled thread tracking mode
                ContinueTryEnterWithThreadTracking(millisecondsTimeout,startTicks,ref lockTaken);
                return;
            }

            // then thread tracking is Disabled
            // In this case there are three ways to acquire the lock
            // 1- the first way the thread either trIEs to get the lock if it's free or updates the waiters,if the turn >= the processors count then go to 3 else go to 2
            // 2- In this step the waiter threads spins and trIEs to acquire the lock,the number of spin iterations and spin count is dependent on the thread turn
            // the late the thread arrives the more it spins and less frequent it check the lock avilability
            // Also the spins count is increaes each iteration
            // If the spins iterations finished and Failed to acquire the lock,go to step 3
            // 3- This is the yIElding step,there are two ways of yIElding Thread.YIEld and Sleep(1)
            // If the timeout is expired in after step 1,we need to decrement the waiters count before returning
 
            int observedOwner;

            //***Step 1,take the lock or update the waiters
 
            // try to acquire the lock directly if possoble or update the waiters count
            SpinWait spinner = new SpinWait();
            while (true)
            {
                observedOwner = m_owner;
                if ((observedOwner & LOCK_ANONYMOUS_OWNED) == LOCK_UNowNED)
                {
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                    Thread.BeginCriticalRegion();
#endif
 
#if PFX_LEGACY_3_5
                    if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner | 1,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                    {
                        lockTaken = true;
                        return;
                    }
#else
                    if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,ref lockTaken) == observedOwner)
                    {
                        return;
                    }
#endif

#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                    Thread.EndCriticalRegion();
#endif
                }
                else //Failed to acquire the lock,then try to update the waiters. If the waiters count reached the maximum,Jsut break the loop to avoID overflow
                    if ((observedOwner & WAITERS_MASK) ==  MAXIMUM_WAITERS || Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner + 2,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                        break;
 
                spinner.SpinOnce();
            }

            // Check the timeout.
            if (millisecondsTimeout == 0 ||
                (millisecondsTimeout != Timeout.Infinite &&
                TimeoutExpired(startTicks,millisecondsTimeout)))
            {
                DecrementWaiters();
                return;
            }

            //***Step 2. Spinning
            //lock acquired Failed and waiters updated
            int turn = ((observedOwner + 2) & WAITERS_MASK) / 2;
            int processorCount = PlatformHelper.ProcessorCount;
            if (turn < processorCount)
            {
                int processFactor = 1;
                for (int i = 1; i <= turn * SPINNING_FACTOR; i++)
                {
                    Thread.SpinWait((turn + i) * SPINNING_FACTOR * processFactor);
                    if (processFactor < processorCount)
                        processFactor++;
                    observedOwner = m_owner;
                    if ((observedOwner & LOCK_ANONYMOUS_OWNED) == LOCK_UNowNED)
                    {
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                        Thread.BeginCriticalRegion();
#endif
 
                        int newOwner = (observedOwner & WAITERS_MASK) == 0 ? // Gets the number of waiters,if zero
                            observedOwner | 1 // don't decrement it. just set the lock bit,it is zzero because a prevIoUs call of Exit(false) ehich corrupted the waiters
                            : (observedOwner - 2) | 1; // otherwise decrement the waiters and set the lock bit
                        Contract.Assert((newOwner & WAITERS_MASK) >= 0);
#if PFX_LEGACY_3_5
                        if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                        {
                            lockTaken = true;
                            return;
                        }
#else
                        if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,ref lockTaken) == observedOwner)
                        {
                            return;
                        }
#endif

#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                        Thread.EndCriticalRegion();
#endif
                    }
                }
            }

            // Check the timeout.
            if (millisecondsTimeout != Timeout.Infinite && TimeoutExpired(startTicks,millisecondsTimeout))
            {
                DecrementWaiters();
                return;
            }

            //*** Step 3,YIElding
            //Sleep(1) every 50 yIElds
            int yIEldsoFar = 0;
            while (true)
            {
                observedOwner = m_owner;
                if ((observedOwner & LOCK_ANONYMOUS_OWNED) == LOCK_UNowNED)
                {
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                    Thread.BeginCriticalRegion();
#endif
                    int newOwner = (observedOwner & WAITERS_MASK) == 0 ? // Gets the number of waiters,if zero
                           observedOwner | 1 // don't decrement it. just set the lock bit,it is zzero because a prevIoUs call of Exit(false) ehich corrupted the waiters
                           : (observedOwner - 2) | 1; // otherwise decrement the waiters and set the lock bit
                    Contract.Assert((newOwner & WAITERS_MASK) >= 0);
#if PFX_LEGACY_3_5
                    if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                    {
                        lockTaken = true;
                        return;
                    }
#else
                    if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,ref lockTaken) == observedOwner)
                    {
                        return;
                    }
#endif
 
#if !FEATURE_CORECLR
                    Thread.EndCriticalRegion();
#endif
                }

                if (yIEldsoFar % SLEEP_ONE_FREQUENCY == 0)
                {
                    Thread.Sleep(1);
                }
                else if (yIEldsoFar % SLEEP_ZERO_FREQUENCY == 0)
                {
                    Thread.Sleep(0);
                }
                else
                {
#if PFX_LEGACY_3_5
                    Platform.YIEld();
#else
                    Thread.YIEld();
#endif
                }
 
                if (yIEldsoFar % TIMEOUT_CHECK_FREQUENCY == 0)
                {
                    //Check the timeout.
                    if (millisecondsTimeout != Timeout.Infinite && TimeoutExpired(startTicks,millisecondsTimeout))
                    {
                        DecrementWaiters();
                        return;
                    }
                }

                yIEldsoFar++;
            }
        }
 
        /// <summary>
        /// decrements the waiters,in case of the timeout is expired
        /// </summary>
        private voID DecrementWaiters()
        {
            SpinWait spinner = new SpinWait();
            while (true)
            {
                int observedOwner = m_owner;
                if ((observedOwner & WAITERS_MASK) == 0) return; // don't decrement the waiters if it's corrupted by prevIoUs call of Exit(false)
                if (Interlocked.CompareExchange(ref m_owner,observedOwner - 2,observedOwner) == observedOwner)
                {
                    Contract.Assert(!IsThreadOwnerTrackingEnabled); // Make sure the waiters never be negative which will cause the thread tracking bit to be flipped
                    break;
                }
                spinner.SpinOnce();
            }
 
        }

从代码中发现SpinLock并不是我们简单的实现那样一直自旋,其内部做了很多优化。 

1:内部使用了Interlocked.CompareExchange保持原子 *** 作, m_owner 0可用,1不可用。

2:第一次获得锁失败后,继续调用ContinueTryEnter,ContinueTryEnter有三种获得锁的情况。

3:ContinueTryEnter函数第一种获得锁的方式。 使用了while+SpinWait,后续再讲。

4:第一种方式达到最大等待者数量后,命中走第二种。 继续自旋 turn * 100次。100这个值是处理器核数(4,8,16)下最好的。

5:第二种如果还不能获得锁,走第三种。   这种就有点混合构造的意味了,如下:
复制代码 代码如下:
if (yIEldsoFar % 40 == 0)
                    Thread.Sleep(1);
                else if (yIEldsoFar % 10 == 0)
                    Thread.Sleep(0);
                else
                    Thread.YIEld();

Thread.Sleep(1) : 终止当前线程,放弃剩下时间片 休眠1毫秒。 退出跟其他线程抢占cpu。当然这个一般会更多,系统无法保证这么细的时间粒度。

Thread.Sleep(0):  终止当前线程,放弃剩下时间片。  但立马还会跟其他线程抢cpu,能不能抢到跟线程优先级有关。

Thread.Yeild():       结束当前线程。让出cpu给其他准备好的线程。其他线程ok后或没有准备好的线程,继续执行。 跟优先级无关。

Thread.Yeild()还会返回个bool值,是否让出成功。

从源码中,我们可以学到不少编程技巧。 比如我们也可以使用  自旋+Thread.Yeild()   或 while+Thread.Yeild() 等组合。


五:总结

本章谈了自旋锁的基础+楼主的经验。  SpinLock类源码这块,只粗浅理解了下,并没有深究。

测了下SpinLock和自己实现的自旋锁性能对比(并行添加1000w List<int>()),SpinLock是单纯的自旋锁性能2倍以上。

还测了下lock的性能,是系统SpinLock性能的3倍以上。  可见lock内部自旋的效率更高,CLR暂没开源,所以看不到CLR具体实现的代码。

总结

以上是内存溢出为你收集整理的C#多线程编程中的锁系统(四):自旋锁全部内容,希望文章能够帮你解决C#多线程编程中的锁系统(四):自旋锁所遇到的程序开发问题。

如果觉得内存溢出网站内容还不错,欢迎将内存溢出网站推荐给程序员好友。

欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出

原文地址: http://outofmemory.cn/langs/1254954.html

(0)
打赏 微信扫一扫 微信扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫
上一篇 2022-06-07
下一篇 2022-06-07

发表评论

登录后才能评论

评论列表(0条)

保存