一、E5 KVM VPS
二、使用评测
SpartanHost是一家成立于2013年的美国主机销售商,产品性能非常不错,稳定性好,客服工单回复速度非常快,大家可以自行去体验下工单的回复速度。
目前SpartanHos主要从事美国西雅图、达拉斯数据中心的KVM架构VPS销售,所以VPS产品根据处理器的不同分为E3、E5两类,根据硬盘的不同分为SSD、HDD两类,并且所有VPS产品都自带20Gbps免费DDoS防御,特比是美西西雅图机房,国内访问速度相对还算不错,非常适合建站使用。
前两天蜗牛也入手了一台此商家SSD E5 KVM VPS,配置为2核1G内存,在此文章做一个简单的评测,供大家选购参考。
一、E5 KVM VPS
下面只列举了SSD E5 KVM VPS的部分方案,如果需要更高配置可以点击查看更多配置到官网选择。
另外如果需要E3系列VPS和达拉斯大硬盘存储VPS可以查看此文章:SpartanHost西雅图/2核(E5)1G内存/15GB SSD硬盘/1Gbps带宽/2TB流量/KVM/20Gbps DDoS/48美元/年(支付宝,适合建站)。
- CPU:1核心
- 内存:512MB
- 硬盘:10GB SSD Raid10
- 带宽:1Gbps
- 流量:1.5TB
- 架构:KVM
- IPv4:1个
- 防御:20Gbps DDoS防御
- 面板:Virtualizor
- 位置:西雅图
- 优惠码:无
- 价格:.5/月 /年
- 购买链接
- CPU:2核心
- 内存:1024MB
- 硬盘:15GB SSD Raid10
- 带宽:1Gbps
- 流量:2TB
- 架构:KVM
- IPv4:1个
- 防御:20Gbps DDoS防御
- 面板:Virtualizor
- 位置:西雅图
- 优惠码:无
- 价格:/月 /年
- 购买链接
- CPU:2核心
- 内存:1536MB
- 硬盘:22GB SSD Raid10
- 带宽:1Gbps
- 流量:2.5TB
- 架构:KVM
- IPv4:1个
- 防御:20Gbps DDoS防御
- 面板:Virtualizor
- 位置:西雅图
- 优惠码:无
- 价格:.5/月 /年
- 购买链接
- CPU:2核心
- 内存:2048MB
- 硬盘:30GB SSD Raid10
- 带宽:1Gbps
- 流量:3TB
- 架构:KVM
- IPv4:1个
- 防御:20Gbps DDoS防御
- 面板:Virtualizor
- 位置:西雅图
- 优惠码:无
- 价格:/月 /年
- 购买链接
二、使用评测
蜗牛自己开通E5系列的2核1内存方案,这里做一个简单的性能及带宽速度评测。
评测结果仅代表服务器即时的性能及带宽状态,仅供参考,不能作为购买不购买的准则,更不代表这是推荐行为。
测试前蜗牛为服务器开启了BBR单边加速软件,评测时间为2018年10月26日晚上22:30。
1、VPS服务器基本信息测试。
宿主机采用E5-2690 v2处理器,蜗牛自己购买的正是此系列方案。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz CPU Cores : 2 Cores @ 2999.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : CentOS 7.4.1708 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 4.19.0-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 Total Space : 15.0 GB (1.4 GB Used) Total RAM : 985 MB (66 MB Used 102 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 511 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 1 min Load Average : 0.10, 0.03, 0.01 TCP CC : bbr ASN & ISP : AS201106, Spartan Host Ltd Organization : Spartan Host Ltd Location : Seattle, United States / US Region : Washington ----------------------------------------------------------------------
2、架构检测。
[root@serverhostname ~]# virt-what kvm
3、硬盘IO读写速度测试。
三次测试平均230.7MB/s,建站使用毫无压力。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 262 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 204 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 226 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 230.7 MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
4、Speedtest测试中国电信、联通、移动到服务器上的上传及下载速度。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 94.99 Mbit/s 684.74 Mbit/s 3.483 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 183.6 Mbit/s - Nanjing CT 7.81 Mbit/s 24.98 Mbit/s - Hangzhou CT 2.34 Mbit/s 8.73 Mbit/s - Shanghai CU 92.36 Mbit/s 308.63 Mbit/s - Xi'an CU 49.97 Mbit/s 115.04 Mbit/s - Chongqing CU 65.46 Mbit/s 33.44 Mbit/s - Chengdu CM 9.53 Mbit/s 12.34 Mbit/s - Kunming CM 10.57 Mbit/s 2.71 Mbit/s - Guangzhou CM 1.90 Mbit/s 1.68 Mbit/s - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
5、VPS在全球各大节点的文件下载速度测试。
VPS的全球文件下载速度测试可以说是非常给力了,而且都比较稳定。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 74.7MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 8.57MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.64MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 14.4MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 14.0MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 4.15MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 30.0MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 51.7MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 9.80MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 8.71MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 10.3MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 22.7MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 33.9MB/s Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 3.36MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 7.14MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 7.95MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 27.9MB/s Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 4.19MB/s Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 12.7MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 11.5MB/s Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 20.6MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
6、中国电信、联通、移动三网ping测试结果。
7、全球节点丢包及抖动测试。
带宽的稳定性可以说是非常好,虽然国内两个监测节点有少量丢包的情况,但是次数比较少,基本可以忽略不计。
8、中国电信、联通、移动路由追踪测试。
广东广州电信
*
23.225.225.225 chinatelecom.600gbps-a.ceranetworks.com
*
chinatelecom.600gbps-a.ceranetworks.com 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 cnservers.com cloudradium.com
N/A
美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 cnservers.com cloudradium.com AS40065
*
AS40065 160.5
*
158.8
广西南宁联通
121.31.3.21
121.31.3.21 *
121.31.3.21
121.31.3.21 N/A
广西南宁 联通
广西南宁 联通 *
AS4837
AS4837 *
21.3
2.8
安徽合肥移动
221.176.27.178
* 221.176.27.178
221.176.27.178
* 上海 移动
上海 移动
N/A AS9808
AS9808
* 19.2
19.2
*
221.183.15.26
221.183.15.26 221.176.23.58
221.183.15.26
221.183.15.26 上海 移动
上海 移动
上海 移动 AS9808
AS9808
AS9808 35
28.5
30.6
202.97.46.5
202.97.46.65 202.97.46.1
202.97.46.5
202.97.46.65 上海 电信
上海 电信
上海 电信 AS4134
AS4134
AS4134 27.9
35.2
32.2
202.97.50.166
202.97.94.237 *
202.97.50.166
202.97.94.237 N/A
上海 电信
上海 电信 *
AS4134
AS4134 *
79.6
72.8
*
202.97.90.33 202.97.90.33
*
202.97.90.33 上海 电信
N/A
上海 电信 AS4134
*
AS4134 30
*
31.2
9、中国电信、联通、移动三网回程路由测试。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===测试 [广州电信(天翼云)] 的回程路由=== Start: Fri Oct 26 10:44:16 2018 HOST: serverhostname.789wn.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 45.43.29.1 0.0% 10 0.3 5.0 0.2 48.1 15.1 2.|-- edge-seattle.as201106.net 0.0% 10 1.3 2.0 0.7 8.6 2.4 3.|-- ae2-0.br3.igw.sea.wowrack 0.0% 10 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.0 4.|-- sea-b2-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.8 1.3 0.7 3.1 0.7 5.|-- sjo-b21-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 27.4 27.4 27.3 27.5 0.0 6.|-- 218.30.54.181 0.0% 10 34.7 31.1 27.5 34.7 2.4 7.|-- 202.97.62.1 0.0% 10 30.0 31.6 28.8 34.8 2.0 8.|-- 202.97.22.121 0.0% 10 176.7 174.0 173.5 176.7 0.9 9.|-- 202.97.94.113 10.0% 10 179.9 180.0 179.8 180.6 0.0 10.|-- 202.97.94.149 20.0% 10 188.8 191.2 188.8 195.3 2.1 11.|-- 183.59.12.85 30.0% 10 180.8 180.6 180.4 180.8 0.0 12.|-- 183.56.129.10 10.0% 10 181.3 181.4 181.1 182.2 0.0 13.|-- 14.215.116.1 20.0% 10 181.3 182.2 181.3 184.0 0.8 ===测试 [上海电信(天翼云)] 的回程路由=== Start: Fri Oct 26 10:44:53 2018 HOST: serverhostname.789wn.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 45.43.29.1 0.0% 10 0.3 0.6 0.2 3.7 1.1 2.|-- edge-seattle.as201106.net 0.0% 10 0.8 32.4 0.8 191.8 68.3 3.|-- ae2-0.br3.igw.sea.wowrack 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.0 4.|-- sea-b2-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 5.7 2.0 1.1 5.7 1.3 5.|-- sjo-b21-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 27.9 27.8 27.6 27.9 0.0 6.|-- 218.30.54.181 0.0% 10 35.4 31.0 28.1 35.4 2.1 7.|-- 202.97.62.9 0.0% 10 31.3 31.9 29.1 35.4 2.1 8.|-- 202.97.58.201 0.0% 10 199.6 199.6 199.4 199.9 0.0 9.|-- 202.97.35.101 0.0% 10 196.3 196.0 194.9 198.3 0.8 10.|-- 202.97.50.173 20.0% 10 251.1 249.9 245.9 252.9 2.3 11.|-- 61.152.24.1 40.0% 10 240.7 239.4 239.0 240.7 0.6 12.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ===测试 [厦门电信CN2] 的回程路由=== Start: Fri Oct 26 10:45:30 2018 HOST: serverhostname.789wn.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 45.43.29.1 0.0% 10 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 2.|-- edge-seattle.as201106.net 0.0% 10 1.0 4.0 0.6 32.4 10.0 3.|-- ae2-0.br3.igw.sea.wowrack 0.0% 10 0.7 1.1 0.6 3.9 0.9 4.|-- sea-b2-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.7 2.7 0.7 18.5 5.5 5.|-- sjo-b21-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 27.4 27.7 27.3 29.3 0.5 6.|-- chinatelecom-ic-307264-sj 0.0% 10 27.9 28.0 27.9 28.1 0.0 7.|-- 59.43.182.146 0.0% 10 166.8 172.4 166.8 221.7 17.3 8.|-- 59.43.187.73 0.0% 10 167.2 167.1 166.8 167.5 0.0 9.|-- 59.43.138.65 0.0% 10 171.0 171.5 168.8 177.4 2.6 10.|-- 59.43.98.26 0.0% 10 195.6 195.6 195.4 196.6 0.0 11.|-- 59.43.139.82 0.0% 10 185.6 185.4 185.2 185.6 0.0 12.|-- 27.159.81.246 0.0% 10 176.5 177.0 175.8 184.3 2.5 13.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.|-- 117.25.150.130 80.0% 10 283.0 233.1 183.2 283.0 70.5 15.|-- 117.25.141.150 0.0% 10 187.6 190.1 187.6 201.0 4.3 16.|-- 117.28.254.129 0.0% 10 192.7 195.1 191.7 203.6 3.7 ===测试 [重庆联通] 的回程路由=== Start: Fri Oct 26 10:45:47 2018 HOST: serverhostname.789wn.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 45.43.29.1 0.0% 10 0.3 0.9 0.2 6.8 2.0 2.|-- six.cnservers.com 0.0% 10 188.2 20.9 1.0 188.2 58.9 3.|-- ae21.mpr1.sea1.us.zip.zay 0.0% 10 10.1 2.5 1.1 10.1 2.8 4.|-- ae27.cs1.sea1.us.eth.zayo 0.0% 10 19.4 19.4 19.2 19.7 0.0 5.|-- ae3.cs1.sjc2.us.eth.zayo. 0.0% 10 19.0 19.2 18.8 19.7 0.0 6.|-- ae27.cr1.sjc2.us.zip.zayo 0.0% 10 18.5 18.5 18.2 19.2 0.0 7.|-- ae16.mpr3.sjc7.us.zip.zay 0.0% 10 19.3 18.9 18.7 19.3 0.0 8.|-- 219.158.33.17 0.0% 10 194.2 192.7 190.0 196.3 2.1 9.|-- 219.158.117.1 0.0% 10 210.2 208.5 204.6 211.1 2.2 10.|-- 219.158.3.141 0.0% 10 217.3 215.1 211.6 218.4 2.3 11.|-- 219.158.5.153 0.0% 10 217.1 213.5 209.7 217.1 2.5 12.|-- 219.158.12.74 0.0% 10 232.4 233.6 230.7 236.9 1.8 13.|-- 113.207.25.114 0.0% 10 228.3 228.3 228.2 228.4 0.0 14.|-- 58.144.255.30 50.0% 10 231.4 231.9 231.2 234.1 0.9 15.|-- 113.207.32.65 0.0% 10 226.1 226.3 226.0 227.7 0.3 ===测试 [上海移动] 的回程路由=== Start: Fri Oct 26 10:46:05 2018 HOST: serverhostname.789wn.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 45.43.29.1 0.0% 10 0.2 3.2 0.2 28.9 9.0 2.|-- six.cnservers.com 0.0% 10 1.1 5.2 1.1 39.2 11.9 3.|-- ae21.mpr1.sea1.us.zip.zay 0.0% 10 2.6 2.5 1.2 8.6 2.1 4.|-- six.chinamobile.com 0.0% 10 32.8 32.9 32.7 33.3 0.0 5.|-- 223.120.6.53 0.0% 10 32.0 32.5 32.0 33.9 0.3 6.|-- 223.120.6.186 0.0% 10 34.8 35.0 34.5 37.4 0.7 7.|-- 223.120.12.26 0.0% 10 204.4 205.0 204.4 206.4 0.5 8.|-- 221.183.55.34 0.0% 10 186.3 186.1 185.8 186.3 0.0 9.|-- 221.183.25.193 0.0% 10 232.9 197.7 189.6 232.9 13.0 10.|-- 221.176.22.13 30.0% 10 230.9 218.6 181.7 272.1 29.5 11.|-- 221.183.13.166 50.0% 10 178.2 183.1 176.9 187.9 5.1 12.|-- . 10.0% 10 201.5 196.0 183.8 226.9 13.2 13.|-- . 10.0% 10 210.6 208.3 183.2 229.5 16.9 14.|-- . 10.0% 10 226.3 212.4 188.6 235.3 19.2 15.|-- . 10.0% 10 230.1 208.9 188.6 231.4 19.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
10、UnixBench跑分测试。
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 26 2018 10:46:24 - 11:14:27 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35884677.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4571.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3014.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 520524.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 143739.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1260615.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 838138.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 108106.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6926.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5995.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1219.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 716362.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35884677.8 3075.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4571.2 831.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 3014.4 701.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 520524.1 1314.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 143739.9 868.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1260615.0 2173.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 838138.7 673.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 108106.9 270.3 Process Creation 126.0 6926.1 549.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5995.6 1414.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1219.4 2032.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 716362.6 477.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 959.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 26 2018 11:14:27 - 11:42:31 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 70892326.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9148.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6518.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 876545.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 240065.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2264942.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1654629.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 259221.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 13102.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9115.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1264.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1315731.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 70892326.1 6074.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9148.8 1663.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 6518.1 1515.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 876545.3 2213.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 240065.7 1450.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2264942.5 3905.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1654629.6 1330.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 259221.8 648.1 Process Creation 126.0 13102.0 1039.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9115.0 2149.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1264.4 2107.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1315731.4 877.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1722.9
欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出
评论列表(0条)