一、实惠方案
二、使用评测
HostKvm是来自国内的知名主机销售商,成立于2013年,香港稳景网络公司旗下品牌。
今天收到了商家发来的十一月最新促销活动,主打新上线的香港湾仔数据中心VPS产品,HKT香港电讯线路,KVM架构,三网PCCW直连,分配较大的带宽。
常规方案最低配置2核心1G内存、80Mbps带宽、550G流量,折后终身只需43元/月(优惠码newhkgl
);特惠方案2核心2G内存、30Mbps、300G流量,折后终身仅需432元/年(优惠码newhkglm
)。
刚才蜗牛也收入了一台2核1G内存、80Mbps标准方案,这里做一个简单的评测,供博友参考。
一、实惠方案
HostKvm所有VPS产品采用KVM虚拟技术架构,商家承诺不超售。
- HKGL-2G-M(特惠年付)
- CPU:1CPU(2vCPU)
- 内存:2048MB
- 硬盘:30GB
- 带宽:30Mbps
- 流量:300GB
- IPv4:1个独立IP
- 系统:Linux/Windows
- 优惠码:
newhkglm
- 价格:432元/年(六折优惠)
- 购买:点击直达
- HKGL-1G(标准套餐)
- CPU:2核心
- 内存:1024MB
- 硬盘:20GB
- 带宽:80Mbps
- 流量:550GB
- IPv4:1个独立IP
- 系统:Linux/Windows
- 优惠码:
newhkgl
- 价格:43.4元/月(七折优惠)
- 购买:点击直达
- HKGL-2G(标准套餐)
- CPU:2核心
- 内存:2048MB
- 硬盘:30GB
- 带宽:80Mbps
- 流量:500GB
- IPv4:1个独立IP
- 系统:Linux/Windows
- 优惠码:
newhkgl
- 价格:47.6元(七折优惠)
- 购买:点击直达
二、使用评测
蜗牛刚才自己购入了一台2核1G内存、80Mbps带宽的标准方案,这里对带宽、性能做一个简单的测试,测试前蜗牛以为自己VPS安装了锐速,测试结果仅代表VPS即时带宽情况及性能状况,仅供参考,不是推荐行为。
测试时间2018年11月14日13:00.
1、VPS基本信息测试。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU Cores : 2 Cores @ 2099.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 16384 KB OS : CentOS 6.6 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 Total Space : 20.0 GB (0.7 GB Used) Total RAM : 996 MB (263 MB Used 33 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 254 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 1 hour 31 min Load Average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 TCP CC : cubic ASN & ISP : AS9312, xTom Hong Kong Limited Organization : xTom Location : , / Region : ----------------------------------------------------------------------
2、硬盘IO读写测试。
339.3 MB/s读写速度,建站是足够使用了。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 336 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 342 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 340 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 339.3 MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
3、中国电信、联通、移动到VPS的上传、下载速度测试。
相当给力了,三网基本都可以跑满。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 66.42 Mbit/s 76.77 Mbit/s 16.231 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 76.5 Mbit/s - Nanjing CT 73.80 Mbit/s 73.41 Mbit/s - Hangzhou CT 68.12 Mbit/s 74.14 Mbit/s - Shanghai CU 75.59 Mbit/s 75.99 Mbit/s - Xi'an CU 69.05 Mbit/s 47.81 Mbit/s - Chongqing CU 76.61 Mbit/s 70.25 Mbit/s - Chengdu CM 53.47 Mbit/s 58.35 Mbit/s - Kunming CM 42.92 Mbit/s 71.28 Mbit/s - Guangzhou CM 43.71 Mbit/s 34.34 Mbit/s - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
4、服务器全球节点文件下载速度测试。
稳不稳定、给不给力看数据就知道了。
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 7.82MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 9.02MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 9.05MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 7.21MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 6.31MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 7.94MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 8.07MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 7.59MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 5.96MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 9.09MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 9.19MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
5、本地ping丢包次数测试。
蜗牛本地是电信带宽;100次发包、0次丢包;平均延迟在26毫秒;最短24毫秒、最长40毫秒,比较稳定了。
6、中国电信、移动、联通ping测试结果。
7、中国电信、移动、联通路由追踪测试。
陕西西安电信
浙江杭州 联通
124.160.81.181
124.160.81.37 124.160.81.21
124.160.81.181
124.160.81.37 浙江杭州 联通
浙江杭州 联通
浙江杭州 联通 AS4837
AS4837
AS4837 2.7
14.9
20.8
219.158.103.218
219.158.19.66 219.158.19.66
219.158.103.218
219.158.19.66 广东广州 联通
广东广州 联通
广东广州 联通 AS4837
AS4837
AS4837 29.8
30.8
29.5
安徽合肥移动
*
192.168.0.2 *
*
192.168.0.2 N/A
N/A
局域网 *
* *
*
2.9
*
* 120.209.132.113
*
* 安徽合肥 移动
N/A
N/A AS9808
*
* 6.2
*
*
*
* 112.29.129.37
*
* 安徽合肥 移动
N/A
N/A AS9808
*
* 0.8
*
*
123.255.91.180
123.255.91.180 pccw3-lacp-10g.hkix.net
123.255.91.180
123.255.91.180 香港 hkix.net
香港 hkix.net
香港 hkix.net 148.5
132.5
143.2
8、中国电信、移动、联通回程路由追踪。
===测试 [广州电信(天翼云)] 的回程路由=== HOST: HostKvm-1197a5 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. 10.233.87.1 0.0% 10 1.6 2.1 1.6 3.0 0.4 3. 10.249.250.17 0.0% 10 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.1 4. 10.0.17.154 0.0% 10 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.0 5. 10.0.21.137 0.0% 10 32.2 18.8 0.8 98.7 32.8 6. 223-197-123-142.static.imsbi 0.0% 10 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 0.1 7. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. 202.97.121.225 0.0% 10 6.7 5.8 2.0 8.8 2.3 9. 202.97.89.53 0.0% 10 11.7 10.8 7.0 14.0 2.4 10. 202.97.94.78 0.0% 10 6.3 6.9 6.2 9.1 1.0 11. 202.97.22.57 0.0% 10 7.3 10.4 7.2 14.0 2.3 12. 183.61.220.81 0.0% 10 6.6 6.9 6.6 8.7 0.6 13. 183.56.129.2 0.0% 10 9.4 8.9 8.4 10.8 0.7 14. 14.215.116.1 0.0% 10 8.7 9.2 8.5 11.9 1.1 ===测试 [上海电信(天翼云)] 的回程路由=== HOST: HostKvm-1197a5 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. 10.233.87.1 0.0% 10 2.4 3.1 1.0 5.0 1.3 3. 10.249.250.17 0.0% 10 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.0 4. 10.0.17.154 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.5 0.2 5. 10.0.21.137 0.0% 10 53.2 7.2 0.8 53.2 16.5 6. 223-197-123-142.static.imsbi 0.0% 10 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.0 7. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8. 202.97.122.118 0.0% 10 1.6 1.7 1.4 3.1 0.5 9. 202.97.122.117 0.0% 10 3.4 5.3 2.3 9.0 2.4 10. 202.97.25.229 0.0% 10 28.0 28.1 28.0 28.5 0.1 11. 202.97.35.85 0.0% 10 26.9 27.0 26.9 27.1 0.1 12. 202.97.57.146 0.0% 10 31.5 33.2 30.3 36.4 2.0 13. 61.152.24.33 0.0% 10 28.5 28.5 28.1 30.1 0.6 14. 101.95.206.2 90.0% 10 31.1 31.1 31.1 31.1 0.0 15. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ===测试 [厦门电信CN2] 的回程路由=== HOST: HostKvm-1197a5 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. 10.233.87.1 0.0% 10 2.3 4.3 1.3 11.1 3.2 3. 10.249.250.17 0.0% 10 6.7 10.2 0.6 21.4 6.9 4. 10.0.17.154 0.0% 10 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.6 0.3 5. 10.0.21.137 0.0% 10 0.7 3.9 0.7 31.2 9.6 6. 223-197-123-142.static.imsbi 0.0% 10 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.1 7. chinatelecomglobal1-10g.hkix 0.0% 10 2.3 3.9 2.3 11.2 3.1 8. 59.43.248.249 0.0% 10 18.2 11.7 7.1 23.4 6.1 9. 59.43.187.117 50.0% 10 7.0 7.2 7.0 7.2 0.1 10. 59.43.130.145 0.0% 10 7.6 14.9 7.6 32.2 11.0 11. 59.43.98.206 0.0% 10 17.6 17.6 17.4 17.7 0.1 12. 27.159.81.254 0.0% 10 31.5 31.3 31.1 31.5 0.1 13. 27.159.81.190 30.0% 10 48.3 45.7 36.3 68.1 10.9 14. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. 117.25.141.150 0.0% 10 35.8 36.2 35.8 37.4 0.4 16. 117.28.254.129 0.0% 10 27.2 169.3 27.2 745.6 272.6 ===测试 [重庆联通] 的回程路由=== HOST: HostKvm-1197a5 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. 10.233.87.1 0.0% 10 1.0 3.8 1.0 9.5 3.0 3. 10.249.250.17 0.0% 10 0.6 1.6 0.6 10.2 3.0 4. 10.0.17.154 0.0% 10 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 5. 10.0.21.137 0.0% 10 0.9 2.8 0.8 10.6 3.5 6. 223-197-123-142.static.imsbi 0.0% 10 7.2 1.8 1.1 7.2 1.9 7. 63-217-17-129.static.pccwglo 0.0% 10 1.5 1.7 1.4 2.7 0.4 8. 219.158.40.98 0.0% 10 1.7 1.6 1.4 2.4 0.3 9. 219.158.40.97 0.0% 10 5.2 3.0 1.4 5.2 1.2 10. 219.158.112.217 0.0% 10 9.1 8.8 6.8 10.0 1.2 11. 219.158.97.26 0.0% 10 14.2 9.8 6.7 14.2 2.7 12. 219.158.24.125 0.0% 10 7.4 10.9 7.4 14.2 2.3 13. 219.158.21.242 0.0% 10 28.9 31.3 28.2 35.8 2.7 14. 113.207.25.114 0.0% 10 31.6 31.8 31.5 33.0 0.4 15. 58.144.255.38 50.0% 10 30.0 32.3 29.4 40.9 4.9 16. 113.207.32.65 0.0% 10 33.1 35.0 33.1 40.7 3.0 ===测试 [上海移动] 的回程路由=== HOST: HostKvm-1197a5 Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. 10.233.87.1 0.0% 10 2.2 2.0 1.2 2.8 0.6 3. 10.249.250.17 0.0% 10 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.0 4. 10.0.17.154 0.0% 10 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.6 0.3 5. 10.0.21.137 0.0% 10 0.9 2.7 0.7 18.7 5.6 6. 223-197-123-142.static.imsbi 0.0% 10 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 0.1 7. te0-3-0-0.br03.hkg08.pccwbtn 0.0% 10 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.5 0.1 8. TenGE0-1-0-8.br02.hkg08.pccw 0.0% 10 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0.1 9. 63.218.205.154 0.0% 10 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.2 0.1 10. ae-1.a01.chwahk02.hk.bb.gin. 0.0% 10 2.5 3.6 2.4 9.0 1.9 11. 203.131.254.2 40.0% 10 20.7 33.5 20.7 42.8 8.8 12. 223.120.2.53 0.0% 10 20.8 34.6 20.8 47.3 8.7 13. 223.120.2.14 0.0% 10 27.1 39.1 27.1 51.6 8.7 14. 221.183.55.62 0.0% 10 28.2 41.9 28.2 57.4 9.7 15. 221.176.24.129 0.0% 10 27.7 45.6 27.7 63.6 12.7 16. 221.176.18.113 0.0% 10 27.8 41.5 27.8 58.3 9.4 17. 221.176.16.205 0.0% 10 58.1 71.0 58.1 89.7 10.3 18. 221.183.13.158 0.0% 10 60.6 69.0 56.9 88.4 9.4 19. . 0.0% 10 59.3 66.6 55.0 78.6 7.8 20. . 0.0% 10 64.1 69.3 59.0 77.0 5.4 21. . 10.0% 10 70.0 68.6 58.5 80.2 6.0
9、UnixBench跑分测试。
2核1G内存配置得分2077.8,算是性能比较好的。
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 14 2018 13:01:20 - 13:29:29 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28538106.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3462.3 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3639.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 882151.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 237039.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2625943.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1553657.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 296490.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9390.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5197.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1148.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2092573.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28538106.6 2445.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3462.3 629.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 3639.1 846.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 882151.6 2227.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 237039.6 1432.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2625943.5 4527.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1553657.5 1248.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 296490.1 741.2 Process Creation 126.0 9390.5 745.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5197.2 1225.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1148.5 1914.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2092573.7 1395.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1366.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 14 2018 13:29:29 - 13:57:40 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 61212218.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7728.0 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 7480.1 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 612073.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 182554.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1834464.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3264773.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 673449.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 25968.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9015.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1333.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3266168.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 61212218.2 5245.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7728.0 1405.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 7480.1 1739.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 612073.8 1545.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 182554.1 1103.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1834464.9 3162.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3264773.0 2624.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 673449.1 1683.6 Process Creation 126.0 25968.2 2061.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9015.5 2126.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1333.1 2221.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3266168.2 2177.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2077.8
10、宝塔跑分测试。
欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出
评论列表(0条)