Comparing the I²C Bus to

Comparing the I²C Bus to,第1张

Abstract: The I²C bus and the SMBus™ are popular 2-wire buses that are essenTIally compaTIble with each other. Normally devices, both masters and slaves, are freely interchangeable between both buses. Both buses feature addressable slaves (although specific address allocaTIons can vary between the two). The buses operate at the same speed, up to 100kHz, but the I²C bus has both 400kHz and 2MHz versions. Complete compaTIbility between both buses is ensured only below 100kHz. This application note focuses on the significant differences between I²C and SMB.

The I²C bus and the SMBus are popular 2-wire buses that are essentially compatible with each other. Normally devices, both masters and slaves, are freely interchangeable between both buses. Both buses feature addressable slaves (although specific address allocations can vary between the two buses). The buses operate at the same speed, up to 100kHz, but the I²C bus has both 400kHz and 2MHz versions. Obviously, complete compatibility between both buses using all devices is ensured only below 100kHz.

This application note focuses on the significant differences between the two buses. Although it is assumed that the reader has some knowledge of the I²C bus and/or the SMBus, let's first review some protocol basics:

  • Start and Stop events. These are especially important in that they are ways of signaling to an interface that it needs to go to an initialized or reset state.
  • Data and Clock must be high to generate Start and Stop. A master can't generate a Start or Stop unless both the Data (SDA for I²C and SMBData for SMBus) and Clock (SCL for I²C and SMBClk for SMBus) lines are free (not pulled low). This is a consequence of being an open-collector bus.
  • Start and Stop conditions are the only times there will be a transition on the Data line while Clock is high.
  • Data can change state only when Clock is low during a communication. The data on Data must always be ready just prior to a high on Clock and be changed only after Clock has gone low (with the exception of Start and Stop).
Comparing the I²C Bus to,Figure 1. A typical communication, showing the Start and Stop conditions.,第2张
Figure 1. A typical communication, showing the Start and Stop conditions. Timeout and Clock SpeedTimeout and (as a consequence of timeout) minimum clock speed are the most important differences between the I²C bus and the SMBus.
I²C Bus = DC (no timeout)
SMBus = 10kHz (35mS timeout)
Timeout is where a slave device resets its interface whenever Clock goes low for longer than the timeout, typically 35mSec. Use of a timeout also dictates a minimum speed for the clock, because it can never go static. Thus, the SMBus has a minimum-clock-speed specification. By comparison, the I²C bus can go static indefinitely. In the I²C bus, either a master or a slave can hold the clock low as long as necessary to process data.

All of this comes about as a result of how the two buses deal with slave errors and recovering from those errors. To understand error recovery, consider that there are two states, Start and Stop, which on a properly designed I²C or SMBus slave dictate that the slave interface go to a specific state. In the case of a Start, the interface should initialize itself and be ready to receive a communication. This should occur regardless of what preceded the Start condition (for example, if the slave was in the middle of a communication in which the master got confused and had to start over). In the case of a Stop, an interface should again initialize itself, but should be expecting a Start prior to any new communication. Both Starts and Stops are the only Data transitions that take place when Clock is high. In order for the transitions on Data to take place, the Data line (and the Clock line) must be "free" to allow the master to place highs and lows on the line as it needs.

In the I²C bus, if the slave locks up and holds either Clock or Data low, error recovery is impossible. Very few slave devices actually have the ability to hold Clock. As a result, the most common bus error is slave devices that have ended up in a state where Data (the data line) is low. In the I²C bus, a master accomplishes error recovery by clocking Clock until Data is high and then issuing a Start followed by a Stop.

In contrast to the I²C bus, SMBus slaves are expected to reset their interface whenever Clock is low for longer than the timeout specified in the SMBus specification of 35mS. As such, SMBus masters such as the Intel PIIX4 don't have any error recovery routine built in. In reality, slave devices need to examine both Clock and Data, even though the SMBus specification doesn't dictate that. This should be done, as experience has shown that slaves in an error state can hold Data low, even though Clock can be high. Implementing timeout exactly according to the SMBus specification doesn't address this error mode.

Table 1. Considerations for Mixing Devices and Masters with Regard to Timeout
  I²C Slave SMB Slave
I²C Master   Clock must be > 10kHz
SMB Master Potential for bus lockup  

The SMBus is limited to a clock speed of 100kHz, whereas I²C permits speeds up to 400kHz. Logic LevelsDespite differences in logic-level specifications between the two buses, generally devices can be mixed and matched with abandon. It has proven rare that either an SMBus or an I²C bus has had a fault due to level differences. This may come as a surprise when we compare the respective level specifications as shown in Figure 1.

Comparing the I²C Bus to,Figure 2. This is a comparison of level specifications between the I2C bus and the SMBus. I2C-VDD-related high and low value ranges are shown for power supplies from 3 volts to 5 volts.,第3张
Figure 2. This is a comparison of level specifications between the I²C bus and the SMBus. I²C-VDD-related high and low value ranges are shown for power supplies from 3 volts to 5 volts.

For further comparison, Table 2 lists the specifications together.

Table 2. Level Specifications for the I²C Bus and the SMBus
VDD is typically expected to be between 3 volts and 5 volts.
High
I²C VDD Dependent
0.7 × VDD
I²C Fixed
3.0V
SMBus
2.1V
Low
I²C VDD Dependent
0.3 × VDD
I²C Fixed
1.5V
SMBus
0.8V

Although there may seem to be quite a bit of difference between level specifications, device interchangeability has not been shown to be a problem in this regard. This is because masters and slaves virtually always have output-voltage swings close to the full supply voltage. Pullup Resistors and Current LevelsWhat wasn't readily evident in the discussion of voltage levels is that these levels are also specified with different currents between the buses. The SMBus specifies a minimum sink current of 100µA, and a maximum of 350µA, compared to 3mA for the I²C bus. This in turn would determine the lowest acceptable value of the pullup resistor, examples of which are shown in the table below.

Table 3. Minimum Pullup Resistor Values per Bus Specifications
 
3V VDD
5V VDD
I²C Bus
> 1k
> 1.6k
SMBus
> 8.5k
> 14k

In reality, it is not unusual to encounter pullup resistor values in SMBus systems, which violate this specification by being lower than recommended. A very popular range for pullup resistor values, even in some SMBus systems, seems to be 2.4k to 3.9k. General Call and Alert ResponseThe I²C bus has an address called General Call, which is 0000 000, and all slaves designed to respond to the General Call will act accordingly. This is a means by which several devices on the system can be communicated with simultaneously.

The SMBus also has a provision for a line called ALERT#, not to be confused with the I²C General Call address. This line acts as an interrupt to the SMBus master. Upon receipt of an interrupt, the SMBus master can issue an Alert Response. This Alert Response is sent to address 0001 100, and any slave device that generated an interrupt attempts to identify itself by putting its own address on the bus. The device with the lowest address will dominate (due to the open-collector bus). If it is serviced and cleared, the master can repeat the process and work up through any other interrupts that may have occurred. Other Little DetailsThere are subtler issues having to do with rise and fall times and bus capacitance that are generally not a concern. In addition, there are some protocol differences with regard to use of Acknowledge and No Acknowledge conditions that are rarely encountered. With most mainstream choices of masters and slaves, none of these factors is typically a problem. Summary of Significant Differences
  1. Timeout and minimum clock speed
  2. Voltage levels
  3. Pullup resistor values and current levels
Table 4. Comparisons
 
I²C
SMBus
Timeout
No
Yes
Minimum Clock Speed
DC
10kHz
Maximum Clock Speed
100kHz (400kHz and 2MHz also available)
100kHz
VHIGH
0.7 × VDD, 3.0V Fixed
2.1V
VLOW
0.3 × VDD, 1.5V Fixed
0.8V
Max I
3mA
350µA
Clock Nomenclature
SCL
SMBCLK
Data Nomenclature
SDA
SMBDAT
General Call
Yes
Yes
Alert#
No
Yes

欢迎分享,转载请注明来源:内存溢出

原文地址: http://outofmemory.cn/dianzi/2488308.html

(0)
打赏 微信扫一扫 微信扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫 支付宝扫一扫
上一篇 2022-08-04
下一篇 2022-08-04

发表评论

登录后才能评论

评论列表(0条)

保存